Over
a period of 20 to 30 years Nepal has shown a tremendous rise in the number of
Higher Education institutions. People have realized the Importance of education
for socio-economic, political, scientific and academic accomplishments. In
retrospect during the Rana regime (around 1846- 1951) when Nepal was ruled by
the autocratic Rana rulers education was prohibited for the fear that educated
people might raise their voices against the Rana authorities. After the end of
the Rana regime and formulation of constitution under monarchical set up
education started to grow in Nepal. Now with the downfall of monarchy and
restoration of democracy the government is laying much emphasis on educating
people to improve their life styles. However the quantitative
growth could not ensure or maintain qualitative standard. It is because of
various factors such as political instability, low funding, lack of
technological advancement, socio- economic condition, party politics,
traditional methodologies, lack of governance and reforms, and issues
concerning accountability. Some of the key features in Higher Education in
Nepal are as given below.
Political Influence
In Nepal colleges and universities are fully controlled
by political parties. Both students and teachers have to acknowledge and
support their party’s meetings and programs which are frequently conducted.
Even for faculty appointment priorities are given to political affiliation
rather than individual competence. When new government is formed there is a
fear in the minds of the teachers of getting their job lost or getting
transferred to remote areas. This has become an everlasting issue in
higher education in Nepal.
Resources and
technology
Generally the universities do not have sufficient fund
to support their infra structures, add resources or even hire best human
resources. In addition the lack of technological advancement aggravate the poor
educational scenario. For instance there are only very few institutions that
carry out teaching learning through power points or high technology.
Research
Research and practice play a vital role in any
educational set up. In Nepal universities do not encourage or carry out
research for institutional rearrangement, enhancement of human resource and
educational development. There is less fund and minimum support from the
government.
Traditional
Methodologies and Outdated curriculum
One of the factors for effective teaching- learning
process attributes to the adoption of latest methodologies and advanced
curriculum. In Nepal most of the universities especially the public ones still
follow traditional method of teaching and the curriculum that has been in
practice for ages. The delivery of lectures on same everlasting topics makes
the entire teaching- learning process very static and monotonous.
Governance and
Reforms
One of the major issues in Nepalese universities is the
lack of governance concerning conducive teaching- learning environment and
effective strategies. There are hardly any policies and programs for ensuring
such arrangements. Universities pay less heed to human resource development,
proper use of the existing resources, and making structural and academic
reforms.
Accountability
The private colleges and universities directly face
with greater public and government accountability whereas the government
colleges and universities have zero accountability. It seems that these public
institutions work with a notion that they are from the government, by the
government and for the government. Comparatively the sense of competence and
improvement is higher in private sector.
Interestingly, accountability differs in terms of
regions. In the US the quality is judged by internal institutional standards
and program reviews with more public accountability. In contrast, the UK and
Australian systems, abide by the national qualification framework. (Henry
,Marshall , Ramburuth 2013 p.3).
To
sum, it is the collective responsibility of both the government and the
universities to look into the major HE issues and resolve them from national
and international level. These problems are arduous challenges which if not
addressed in time may lead to educational devastation.
Reference
Henry,R.,Marshall,S.,Ramburuth,P.(2013).
Improving Assessment in Higher Education:
A Whole of Institution Approach.UNSW Press.