In Nepal after the
end of absolute monarchy and restoration of constitutional democracy in1990 the
government laid much emphasis on the expansion of education realising its
importance as a part of raising the social status and freedom of every Nepali
citizen. Curriculum was reshaped and refined to enhance the teaching- learning
process and test the achievement of students. Much effort was put in discarding
traditional teaching- learning practice and embracing modern or global teaching-
learning methodologies in all pre- primary, primary, lower secondary, secondary
and higher secondary (12) level.
Curriculum
Development Centre (CDC) takes the responsibilities in planning and developing
the national curriculum. The curriculum which is directed towards intended student
learning outcomes is based on two types of abilities:
- Knowledge
and understanding
- Practical
abilities
These abilities are attained through the following principles
of student assessment.
- Formative
assessment - This type of assessment
includes unit test, class test, participation, attendance, home- assignments
and project work. It is targeted to instructional improvement. Here the
internal assessment is 25% and external assessment is 75%.
- Summative
assessment- This incorporates qualifying
test/send up exams and final examination/SLC (School Leaving Certificate). Here
the internal assessment is 25% and the external assessment is 75%.
- Comprehensive
student assessment system- Ministry of
Education & Sports (MOES) sets a pass mark 40% for all schools and external
marks 75% for secondary level.
Recently, Department of Education (DOE) has initiated inclusive
education in the national curriculum and it is a great educational reform in
Nepal. The target group consists of girl child, children with disability,
Dalits (marginalized and socially backward community), minority ethnic groups,
children in jail, children affected by war/conflict and so forth. This policy
has ensured children to right to education as a fundamental right.
One major issue in SLC is that education has
been very exam oriented rather than based on knowledge. Every school is more
focused on methods and ways to be adopted so that students get high grades in
SLC examinations. I feel that the real learning is simply missing. Assessment
and evaluation experts like Kellaghan and Greaney (1992, as cited in Mathema
& Bista 2006) argue that examination can deteriorate the quality of
education. In schools the focus is only on what should be taught and how it
should be taught. In my view assessment should be directed towards the holistic
development of students. It should not be like a game that has to be won in any
way.
Another shortcoming is concerning formative
assessment in which lack of instructional approach especially in public schools
and a few private schools too has adversely affected the learning outcomes of
students. Teachers are not skilled and lack expertise to take the feedback from
parents, the school management and students on improving the learning outcomes
and excelling the teaching- learning process. The role of a teacher is confined
to only teaching from books and the scenario is “guru” being the active speaker
and the students simply passive listeners. This is one of the reasons for
downward trend in SLC pass percentage over the past years. What is needed in
the present context is emphasis on practical knowledge or project based
learning. This type of learning can not only help teachers to explore children’s
capabilities and skills but also evaluate their creativity.
Overall, it is a collective responsibility of schools,
district education officers, school supervisors, school management, teachers,
parent communities and various stakeholders to help ensure the proper
implementation of the national curriculum for effective learning outcomes.
References
Ministry of Education
& Sports Curriculum Development Centre. Sanothimi, Bhaktapur. (2005). National Curiculum Framework for School
Education (Pre- primary- 12) in Nepal. Retrieved from
www.librarykvpattom.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/ncf-nepal.pdf.
Mathema, K.B, &
Bista, M.B. (2006). Report on Study of
Student Performance in SLC. Retrieved from
web.nitc.gov.np/phocadoenload/curriculum_reports/slc.